From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Daniel J. Sinder" <djsinder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Emphasis and bold in quotation
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:13:21 -0800
Message-ID: <47324691.3090903@gmail.com>
References: <ae9590aa0711070912t6a2bcdbcod2132f4dfccb856c@mail.gmail.com>
	<b71b18520711071016l2b98fc82l9c93196b9bddeec0@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ipu5N-00059l-Sr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:13:25 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ipu5M-00058g-5C
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:13:25 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipu5L-00058X-WA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:13:24 -0500
Received: from sd-green-bigip-207.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.207]
	helo=randymail-a9.g.dreamhost.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <djsinder@gmail.com>) id 1Ipu5L-0006rn-Lf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:13:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <b71b18520711071016l2b98fc82l9c93196b9bddeec0@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eddward DeVilla <eddward@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 11/07/2007 10:16 AM, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> Say:
>  [*|This is [/|really] important!].  No. [*/_|Really!]

@<i>Why not @<b>@<u> re-use @</u>@</b> a markup that's @<u> already
in use @</u>@</i>.

I say bring the simple, single-character markup back to the original
incarnation:  *one* word /only/.

Dan