From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Moynihan Subject: Re: Re: POLL: Volume of emacs-orgmode too high? Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:08:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4714E1EE.5050105@calicojack.co.uk> References: <87ir57mmqg.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> <4714CFFB.7050809@calicojack.co.uk> <41c818190710160803nf1544dbge5425bfbc99628bc@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhoyB-0004WW-EX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:08:35 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhoyA-0004Uc-98 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:08:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ihoy9-0004UF-Sd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:08:34 -0400 Received: from storm.bpweb.net ([83.223.106.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ihoy8-0006T3-Dv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:08:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <41c818190710160803nf1544dbge5425bfbc99628bc@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: William Henney Cc: org-mode William Henney wrote: >> Agreed. I do fall behind on reading it every now and then but I always >> try and catch up because the quality of discussions is so high. I like >> having such a receptive community. >> > > Agreed too. Sometimes my eyes glaze over the GTD threads, but I can > always mute the threads I'm not interested in. Perhaps an additional > low volume org-mode-announce list would be a good idea for those more > interested in product than process... > To be honest I think we're still too small to justify the overhead of another list. When we're touching on having 100s of posts a day, maybe. R.