From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian van den Broek Subject: Re: feature request: retain scheduled time of done scheduled TODO's Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:19:56 -0400 Message-ID: <46D75EAC.7080107@cc.umanitoba.ca> References: <46CF5A28.40505@cc.umanitoba.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IQuF9-0001xA-6B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:20:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IQuF6-0001vu-3c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:20:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQuF5-0001vY-Rk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:20:07 -0400 Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca ([130.179.16.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IQuF5-0002nd-K2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:20:07 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.113] (bas5-montreal02-1167961292.dsl.bell.ca [69.157.172.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l7V0Jwpl005891 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:20:07 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik said unto the world upon 08/30/2007 04:06 AM: > > On Aug 25, 2007, at 0:22, Brian van den Broek wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have a feature request. >> >> When marking a scheduled TODO as done, I generally want to retain the >> information about for when it was scheduled. I wish to do so so as to > > I don't really remember why I used to remove the "SCHEDULED" info > at all when adding a CLOSED time stamp. No need, really. In 5.07 > this will be changed - if it breaks anything, I will make it an > option. > > - Carsten Hi all, Thanks Carsten, both for implementing this and for all the other 5.07 goodness. I've noticed no problems with this feature so far. BTW The manual says that it is for v5.08 but the latest release is 5.07a. Best, Brian vdB