From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel J. Sinder" Subject: Re: strip date in agenda view Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:31:33 -0700 Message-ID: <467AB5F5.5050408@gmail.com> References: <0rir9q1qk5.fsf@bass.biostat.umn.edu> <30b434fe0706150714w55644e92x4000ed41293d0200@mail.gmail.com> <2683649d860709b2ed1167c4c22a6f32@science.uva.nl> <46781426.8010501@gmail.com> <55fb126145cc3ffddb222423db2263b4@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1QVP-0006QM-DY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:31:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1QVN-0006QA-R6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:31:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1QVN-0006Q7-Nv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:31:37 -0400 Received: from sd-green-bigip-207.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.207] helo=randymail-a11.g.dreamhost.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I1QVN-0005Qu-GQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:31:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55fb126145cc3ffddb222423db2263b4@science.uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: NL , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 06/21/2007 02:29 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2007, at 19:36, Daniel J. Sinder wrote: > >> Carsten, >> >> I like this new syntax better too. >> >> I can't find it in the manual now, but I think the following syntax, >> which is nearly as simple, was supported (I use it regularly): >> >> *** Meeting 15:30-17:00 <2007-06-13 Wed> > > This is correct, but only works it the times are in the headline. > The new syntax also works if you place the stamp with times > somewhere in the body of the entry. Thanks for the clarification >> In the agenda, the time is stripped but the date is not. Although I >> prefer the new syntax, would it be possible to strip the date in >> this old syntax too? > > Hmmm, if necessary I could, of course. Not necessary -- I'm already using the new format. It would only serve to clean up the agenda for some forthcoming items. Eventually they'll all pass. > >> Will the new syntax work with a repeater too? E.g., >> >> *** Meeting <2007-06-03 Wed 15:30-17:00 +1w> > > Yes. And you can even use S-up/down to modify the "1" and the "w". > > - Carsten >