From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Timeline view - bug or by design?
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 07:19:35 +0200
Message-ID: <46505454a96108070a89792d0b095583@science.uva.nl>
References: <47095C6E.9080800@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IenMP-0001lo-8l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:49:05 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IenML-0001fw-Jz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:49:02 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IenMK-0001ff-Qw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:49:00 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dominik@science.uva.nl>) id 1IenMK-00007q-B7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:49:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <47095C6E.9080800@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Wanrong Lin <wanrong.lin@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Oct 8, 2007, at 0:23, Wanrong Lin wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The agenda timeline view does not show any "SCHEDULED" todo items, but 
> does show items with an plain active time stamp without preceding 
> "SCHEDULED". Is that a bug or by design? If that is by design, what is 
> the rationale here? Thanks a lot for explaining this.

This is a bug, fixed for next release, thank you.

- Carsten