From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent Beffara <vbeffara+ml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LaTeX export: Theorem with an author
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:26:49 +0100
Message-ID: <45796E66E2EF4ECC8FCD369BC89DDD0A@gmail.com>
References: <9CD440C643384D4EB0732CBE5F4161F1@gmail.com>
	<87txpmfuhg.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60373)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vbeffara+ml@gmail.com>) id 1U4gIQ-0006mN-UN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:26:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vbeffara+ml@gmail.com>) id 1U4gIP-0000Ci-OX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:26:54 -0500
Received: from mail-ea0-f178.google.com ([209.85.215.178]:38099)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vbeffara+ml@gmail.com>) id 1U4gIP-0000CQ-II
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:26:53 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f178.google.com with SMTP id a14so2465802eaa.23
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:26:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87txpmfuhg.fsf@gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi,
> There's no right way at the moment: I forgot to implement this.
> 
> Anyway, since this feature was LaTeX only, what do you think about the
> following syntax (which doesn't work yet):
> 
> #+attr_latex: :options [Newton]
> #+begin_theorem
> Blah.
> #+end_theorem
> 
> It is heavier but it seems more consistent to me.
It does seem more consistent with things like fig captions and so on - thanks for implementing! A little bit more verbose but that's fine ... and I agree that the previous "#+begin_theorem Somebody" felt a bit vague. How about a middle ground like this ?

#+begin_theorem :options [Him]
slkdfj
#+end_theorem
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Nicolas Goaziou