From: Jos'h Fuller <Jos'h.Fuller@arcproductions.com>
To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Tangling without clutter?
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:34:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B0EAE8544C834188E8790873CDE1CC3EA752@ARCEXCHANGE.arc.local> (raw)
Hi!
I was writing some documentation about how to use a Python function, so I decided to try the tangling feature. However, the result, when exported to PDF, is unsatisfactory because the referenced code block is included twice -- first in the original location, then again where I referenced it with <<function-definition>>.
This is, of course, exactly what it needs to do to be able to execute the code properly and show the result. But it doesn't look nice. Is there any way to suppress the second printing inside the function-demo block?
If this isn't clear from the example below, I can provide examples of the duplication in action as well as what I'd like the output to look like.
Thanks very much!
Example file:
#+TITLE: Tangle Test
#+LANGUAGE: en
#+OPTIONS: H:3 num:nil toc:nil \n:nil @:t ::t |:t ^:nil -:t f:t *:t <:t
#+OPTIONS: TeX:t LaTeX:t skip:nil d:nil todo:t pri:nil tags:not-in-toc
* Tangled Code
I want to show the definition of a function first:
#+name: function-definition
#+begin_src python :tangle yes :exports code
def entable(data):
if not data: return "/No data./"
columns = len(data[0])
sizes = [0,]*columns
for row in data:
sizes = [max(x) for x in zip(sizes, [len(str(t)) for t in row])]
format = "| " + " | ".join(["%%%ds" % x for x in sizes])+" |"
return "\n".join([format % tuple(row) for row in data])
#+end_src
Now I want to show a demonstration of how the function might be
called. I need the function to be included so that demonstration
code can be executed, but I don't want to include the function
definition twice:
#+name: function-demo
#+begin_src python :tangle yes :exports both :noweb yes :results output
<<function-definition>>
print entable([["One", 2, 3],["Four", 5, 6], ["Seven", 8, 9]])
#+end_src
Which gives us this result:
#+results: function-demo
: | One | 2 | 3 |
: | Four | 5 | 6 |
: | Seven | 8 | 9 |
next reply other threads:[~2012-03-14 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-14 17:34 Jos'h Fuller [this message]
2012-03-14 18:22 ` Thomas S. Dye
2012-03-14 18:39 ` Jos'h Fuller
2012-03-14 19:13 ` Eric Schulte
2012-03-14 19:35 ` Jos'h Fuller
2012-03-14 18:34 ` Eric Schulte
2012-03-14 22:08 ` Jos'h Fuller
2012-03-14 20:52 ` Eric Schulte
2012-03-15 6:25 ` Viktor Rosenfeld
2012-03-15 8:42 ` Jacek Generowicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B0EAE8544C834188E8790873CDE1CC3EA752@ARCEXCHANGE.arc.local \
--to=jos'h.fuller@arcproductions.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--subject='Re: Tangling without clutter?' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).