From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: log on state change Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 05:32:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4449e8c77944fc9279b7b6c30b119754@science.uva.nl> References: <87abs6j0av.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <0ae951a333c90e9d17ccadcfb9e172ee@science.uva.nl> <8e4043639cf71fc8b0ea77cfff4c9a58@science.uva.nl> <87sl5ufkj5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISldY-00081r-Fa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 23:33:04 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISldX-0007zZ-GP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 23:33:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISldX-0007zM-D2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 23:33:03 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISldW-0004uw-QJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 23:33:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sl5ufkj5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sep 4, 2007, at 18:43, Bastien wrote: > Leo writes: > >> Using tags to setup todo looks unclean to me. However it is very nice >> to >> be able to set up todo using an interface similar to tags. >> >> And since the argument to org-todo has become completely useless >> because >> of this feature. I propose the following: >> >> C-c C-t (`org-todo') brings up an interface similar to the one for >> org-set-tags but only for todos (C-c C-c only for tags) > > I wish we could stick to the yes-very-busy C-c C-c key for setting both > TODOs and tags. I am no longer sure this is a good idea, if at all this will be optional. > Here is another suggestion: why not restrict the fast selection to TODO > keywords when the point is at TODO keywords, and to tags when the point > is on tags? Definitely a NO. Who would want to move the cursor before setting tags??? > Another argument to let C-c C-t continue its job is that it is able to > distinguish between "sequence" TODOs and "type" TODOs. This is > extremely > useful -- especially when C-c C-t is bound to `org-agenda-todo' and you > don't remember whether the expected TODO keywords for a headline are > part of a sequence or are types. Interesting to know that you are using this distinction. I was wondering if anybody did. - Carsten