From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: BUG: org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr without requiring cl Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:34:21 +0100 Message-ID: <425CD935-9BD5-42B9-AF92-60ED7821D5FA@gmail.com> References: <20091109130727.GG29752@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <12966.1257780233@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87r5s776bu.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7bsi-0000GG-NI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:34:36 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7bsc-0000Dc-NL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:34:36 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40858 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7bsc-0000DX-LG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:34:30 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:50983) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7bsY-0002Fe-Nu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:34:28 -0500 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so4685162ewy.42 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:34:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r5s776bu.fsf@gmx.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: org-mode mailing list On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:10 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: >> Adam Spiers wrote: >> >>> org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr but does not require the cl >>> package; this results in >>> >>> *ERROR*: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr >>> >>> when bzg/org-annotate-helper is invoked. >>> >>> >> >> Isn't org-annotation-helper.el obsolete? I thought org-protocol.el >> has >> supplanted it completely, in which case it might be better to just >> delete it from the tree, instead of fixing it (or perhaps move it >> to a deprecated area) - that would also help in not confusing new >> users. > > > Yes, if everyone is OK with that removal. The functionality of > org-annotation-helper is re-implemented in > org-protocol. org-annotation-helper.el was one of the parents > actually. Some code is still in there. That's why it's authors are > mentioned their, too. > > Anyway, org-annotation-helper.el might still be in use somewhere. I have no objection to remove it, if the author agrees. Can anyone try to figure that out? Thanks - Carsten > > > > Sebastian > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode - Carsten