From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "William Henney" Subject: Re: a couple of minor issues with links (v 4.77) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:21:54 -0500 Message-ID: <41c818190706120621l4f16e7c9nf586456585182489@mail.gmail.com> References: <41c818190706090924o71797e15g80b4e5ed7cbe01ea@mail.gmail.com> <731cde26e5f852d3c0535ad48995c1a5@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy6Jq-0008Rs-9v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:21:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy6Jo-0008RY-QC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:21:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy6Jo-0008RV-Nx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:21:56 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.242]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hy6Jo-0000fw-EY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:21:56 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so358589ana for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:21:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <731cde26e5f852d3c0535ad48995c1a5@science.uva.nl> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Hi Carsten On 6/12/07, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2007, at 18:24, William Henney wrote: > > > ** Access stored links when editing existing link > > It would be good if you had some access to stored links when using > > C-c C-l to edit an existing link. As far as I can see this does not > > work at present. > > No it does not. Removing the link, for example with > with `C-M-k' (when cursor is before the link), or with > `Esc C-delete' (when cursor is after the link), > and then inserting a new one is a pretty fast alternative. > > Still, you proposal makes sense, will put it on the list. > Thanks. I was thinking of the case where you want to change the link target, but not the description. In that case, deleting the whole link is less convenient. But thanks for teaching me a new key sequence :) I knew about C-M-k but not about Esc C-delete. Odd, though, that it isn't also bound to C-M-delete... A problem that I have with these sexp commands, and the reason I don't use them much, is that they are very finicky about where the cursor is. This is especially annoying in the case of links, where there are several cursor positions at the beginning and end of the link that are visually indistinguishable. Maybe there is a call for an org-delete-link command that would work with the cursor anywhere in the link, but I wouldn't give this a high priority. Cheers Will --=20 Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronom=EDa y Astrof=EDsica, Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico, Campus Morelia