From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "William Henney" Subject: Re: a couple of possible bugs in filling/indenting of plain lists Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:46:03 -0500 Message-ID: <41c818190706041646l68b9b929vc2ad302057ac06b7@mail.gmail.com> References: <41c818190706010909v11ec26e2n47138302473cccb8@mail.gmail.com> <2acbb96883f80634968b52dfa0c1d600@science.uva.nl> <41c818190706040639v598351f2mc4e0ebeec9dec3c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvMFS-0002vb-0I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:46:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvMFQ-0002v9-AQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:46:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvMFQ-0002v4-12 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:46:04 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HvMFP-0000Lk-LG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:46:03 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so329776ana for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:46:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode On 6/4/07, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2007, at 15:39, William Henney wrote: > > > Thanks Carsten. Is this fix just for the indent-relative bug, or does > > it fix the second (fill-paragraph) bug as well? > > The fix will only fix the second bug (with fill-paragraph). The first > problem I believe cannot be fixed, because Org-mode cannot know if > you want to start a new level of lists, or if you are continuing the > current list. > Thanks for the explanation. I am still a bit confused though, since even if org thought I wanted to start a new list, then it should only indent by one space, whereas it actually indents by two.... I repeat my original example here: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ** Problem with indent-relative in lists 1. If I carry out the instruction in the following list item, the item is indented right by 2 spaces 2. *Press TAB key with the cursor in this line* 3. The same thing happens with + or - bullets 4. I have org-cycle-include-plain lists set to nil 5. The problem also appears even with all single-line items ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In the case of ordered lists, I think that you can tell (in principle) if the item represents the start of a new list. Whether it is worth your effort is another matter :) Cheers Will --=20 Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronom=EDa y Astrof=EDsica, Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico, Campus Morelia