From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Caldwell Subject: bug#22735: please close 22735 (i would like to replace it with 22776) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <410977716.1086822.1456182762633.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <410977716.1086822.1456182762633.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: David Caldwell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1086821_281868347.1456182762632" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXzfA-0003Z8-7D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:13:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXzf6-0005s8-70 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:13:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXzf6-0005rg-2r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:13:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXzf4-000306-77 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:13:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2087038768.5072162.1455816536097.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "22735@debbugs.gnu.org" <22735@debbugs.gnu.org> ------=_Part_1086821_281868347.1456182762632 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable After more experimentation, I got a better understanding of the functionali= ty and now consider bug 22735 to be invalid as written. =C2=A0I now think i= t's a more fundamental issue of not handling an Effort_ALL with more than 1= 0 entries. That issue is documented in bug #22776(interactive org-set-effort (C-c C-x = e) and column view direct index selection do not handle Effort_ALL with mor= e than 10 entries). David ------=_Part_1086821_281868347.1456182762632 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
After more experimentation, I got a better understanding o= f the functionality and now consider bug 22735 to be invalid as written. &n= bsp;I now think it's a more fundamental issue of not handling an Effort_ALL= with more than 10 entries.

That issue is documented in bug #22776(interactive org-set-effort (C-c C= -x e) and column view direct index selection do not handle Effort_ALL with = more than 10 entries).
<= br>
David
------=_Part_1086821_281868347.1456182762632--