From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Piotr Zielinski Subject: Re: Repeated entry same time every day? Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:51:12 +0100 Message-ID: <3c12eb8d0905051551n4f3305d6ub8bb954bcf9415a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <3c12eb8d0905051519q7dab3c79p6d706c3674ae1913@mail.gmail.com> <878wlb5gde.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1TTp-0006oT-V7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 18:51:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1TTl-0006ne-F8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 18:51:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55963 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1TTl-0006nb-C4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 18:51:13 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250]:50006) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M1TTl-0006g8-13 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 18:51:13 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b38so3046071ana.21 for ; Tue, 05 May 2009 15:51:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878wlb5gde.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bernt Hansen Cc: emacs-orgmode On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > Piotr Zielinski writes: > >> Is it possible to have a repeater (say SCHEDULED: <2009-05-05 Tue >> 16:00 +24h> or something) that would ensure that the given entry is >> automatically scheduled at the same time every day? > > Sure. =C2=A0Just try it :) =C2=A0Try +1d instead of +24h like this: > > * TODO One > =C2=A0SCHEDULED: <2009-05-08 Fri 13:00-15:00 +1d> Thanks a lot! It turns out that I had some code that was explicitly removing the time. Piotr > > -Bernt >