From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-set/delete-property Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:38:31 +0100 Message-ID: <3C4F914D-8D8E-44DF-8F0C-4D9A36BB0402@gmail.com> References: <878w9zkopt.fsf@eee.lan> <874oknkoka.fsf@eee.lan> <87mxyfj9cl.fsf@eee.lan> <1B465F86-9D70-411F-93F7-E5EFE40BF0FA@gmail.com> <87iq93j6u1.fsf@eee.lan> <1783E925-8587-4FB1-A289-24C0FD7B1247@gmail.com> <87zl2ekdwe.fsf_-_@eee.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nq7w3-00089J-KA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:42:04 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44779 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nq7w1-00081E-L5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:42:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nq7sf-00029Z-Pw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:38:36 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com ([209.85.219.216]:45185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nq7sf-00029K-Ku for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:38:33 -0500 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so387800ewy.8 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:38:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zl2ekdwe.fsf_-_@eee.lan> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mikael Fornius Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi MIchael, are these changes relative to the current git version, or relative to the state before your initial change? - Carsten On Mar 11, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Mikael Fornius wrote: > > Hmm... I realize I should have thought some more about this before > posting the original patch. > > I have second thoughts: > > I think the behavior to take property under cursor as the one intended > to change when editing properties feels forcing and may be confusing. > > Therefore I suggest two alternatives: > > make it default alternative > > > or always prompt (like before) > > > For me they feels the same but I think the "always prompt" alternative > is better because it is simpler. > > Simple is always good. > > Sorry for spamming the change-log. > > -- > Mikael Fornius - Carsten