From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julius Dittmar Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:30:33 +0100 Message-ID: <3648e221-9af2-20e6-bf28-06abcec33f0f@gmx.de> References: <87bmhooaj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvveqi7u.fsf@bzg.fr> <87wp0a57i5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lggp6fvh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1216ca1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3kp4qnn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ee1T4-0006jn-Tb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:30:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ee1T1-0000HP-Qc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:30:38 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:62836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ee1T1-0000Gn-Gu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:30:35 -0500 Received: from [192.168.175.209] ([87.139.53.30]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhwLy-1f8OCZ2mOo-00nCUC for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:30:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 23.01.2018 um 16:19 schrieb Kaushal Modi: > There is another issue with "begin_src org" blocks. If your example > contains a link, you only see the description part, not the whole > syntax. Thus > > #+begin_src org > [[path][description]] > #+end_src > > is seen as > > #+begin_src org > description > #+end_src > > which can be very confusing. > > > Wouldn't that qualify as a bug? Shouldn't text in src blocks always be > shown verbatim without any overlays? Use of example block instead of src > block using this as one of the reasons looks like a workaround. I think not. As far as I understood, a src block is tagged with a style information so the appropriate emacs mode for displaying this kind of code is used. So the second display is exactly what I'd expect. Julius