From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:00:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3420.1300906800@alphaville.usa.hp.com> References: <20110322051038.21655c80@kuru.homelinux.net> <80d3lj9wj6.fsf@somewhere.org> <20110322053134.669127e9@kuru.homelinux.net> <8999.1300804510@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <20110322160814.227fc53f@bhishma.homelinux.net> <27844.1300836065@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <87ipv9gbst.fsf@gnu.org> <7864.1300892560@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <8930.1300898540@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <81ipv9g0qv.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41394 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2THo-0005CY-94 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:00:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2THn-00058h-8D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:00:04 -0400 Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.34]:36865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2THn-00056k-2j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:00:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Jambunathan K of "Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:47:28 +0530." <81ipv9g0qv.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: Lawrence Mitchell , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jambunathan K wrote: > > >> For example, I don't know if the docbook backend explicitly > >> writes section numbers in, or if the sectioning is left to the > >> stylesheet. If the latter, can I mark sections as ones that > >> should be numbered and ones that shouldn't? > >> > > > > And I'm sure Jambunathan will take care of the odt exporter. > > I think from odt side of things users are very likely to turn off > numbering and toc altogether and be more than happy to give finishing > touches with automatic outline numbering facility and automatic toc > generation facility offered by the viewers. > > Currently the TOC and section-numbering generated by the odt exporter is > artificial. i.e., It looks like section numbers and TOC but the > underlying xml elements are not spitted out by the odt exporter. > > Considering that the odt exporter is new I believe there is some > flexibility on my side to reject certain features as too niche for a > first level release :-). > Of course: if somebody needs the functionality, they implement it and submit it - that's open source in a nutshell. OTOH, it is important to document such limitations, so that innocent users don't end up spending hours trying to do something that cannot be done. Nick