From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Links in tables and LaTeX export Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: <31665.1309885396@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87vcvhlysk.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe927-0004mT-Nj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:03:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe923-0006tY-7y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:03:35 -0400 Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.17]:51660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe922-0006sx-JB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:03:30 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LNV003U9E1GI4B0@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:03:18 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) of "Tue, 05 Jul 2011 05:18:37 -1000." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: Org-mode , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Nicolas Goaziou Thomas S. Dye wrote: > I can confirm that the formerly broken links in my tables work with > Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.596.gea215). > I'm puzzled (and a bit worried about the integrity of my tree): I pulled a short while ago and ''git describe HEAD'' says: baseline-490-gde0fcdf so it seems I have an extra tag between release_7.5 and HEAD and although I have no idea where it came from, it does not seem to be much of a problem[fn:1], since I can get things relative to release_7.5: $ git describe --long --match release_7.5 HEAD release_7.5-579-gde0fcdf But why do I have 579 commits since then and you have 596 (and the HEADs have different SHA1s)? Are you applying local mods? That would explain the discrepancy in the commit count, as well as the discrepancy in the SHA1, but if so, why isn't your version marked ``dirty''? Just trying to understand, Nick Footnotes: [fn:1] For the record, in my tree, ``baseline'' is related to release_7.5 like so: $ git describe --match release_7.5 --long baseline release_7.5-89-g3d802ee