From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [OT] Current website not very attractive Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:02:04 -0400 Message-ID: <3115.1344571324@alphaville> References: Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzgQT-0004aO-2Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:02:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzgQP-0004BK-P8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:02:17 -0400 Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:45159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzgQP-00048G-IS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:02:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Sankalp of "Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:39:04 +0530." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sankalp Cc: Jude DaShiell , Org Mode , Marcelo de Moraes Serpa Sankalp wrote: > --f46d044401de1e3ad604c6de28a7 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I'm inclined to agree with Marcelo. > -- > Sankalp > > ******************************************************* > If humans could mate with software, I'd have org-mode's > babies. > --- Chris League on Twitter. > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-quotes.html > ******************************************************* > > > On 10 August 2012 04:44, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > Good, that probably means it's one of the more accessible and usable web > > sites on the internet. > > > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > > > > > Hey list, > > > > > > Don't want to be negative, but doesn't anyone else also think the current > > > design is kind of amateurish and not very attractive? I also did not like > > > the screenshot used, I preferred the previous one, it showed more org > > > capabilities, and the colors and indentation looked better. > > > > > > My two cents and food for thought, > > > Talk is cheap: how would you improve it? And I don't mean generalities: build a website as you think it should be and then invite us over to take a look. And as Jude suggests, don't forget to keep accessibility/usability issues in mind as you design. Nick