From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Graham Smith Subject: Re: [babel] R - variable names in summary Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:00:08 +0000 Message-ID: <2c75873c0912091300g22d57a45h83e2387031c277dc@mail.gmail.com> References: <2c75873c0912081550m5da3861fgb3a14f047f8638ae@mail.gmail.com> <87k4wwf6h1.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <2c75873c0912090905y5d673fe3m879e7e79e77f3c89@mail.gmail.com> <87vdggdkob.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <2c75873c0912091233n788df5o86f603922138ad3f@mail.gmail.com> <87ein3ev30.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NITdv-00019H-1t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:00:15 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NITdq-00016G-6e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:00:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46146 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NITdp-000166-Us for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:00:10 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com ([209.85.220.213]:60592) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NITdp-0005dF-EH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:00:09 -0500 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so7249738fxm.8 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:00:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ein3ev30.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dan >> Not being a programmer, I find the terminology and phrasing of these > > I wouldn't classify someone who analyses their data with R as a > non-programmer. Mmmm, I can see why you would say this, but I don't really program in R, but have collected a library of R code over the years which I know how to use and tweak. >> My problem was therefore =C2=A0the lack of examples specific to R. > > Yes, I can see that. I can imagine that if shell/python/ruby code looks > alien then the examples using those languages are not very > inviting. Thanks for pointing that out. Tom Dye and Eric and I are > working on documentation, including a Worg page specifically for R with > org-babel. Currently it doesn't contain anything you don't know but > we'll let you know when the first version goes up on Worg. I look forward to it. Thanks again, Graham