From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Capture and checkitem Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:26:37 +0200 Message-ID: <2DEA5911-A30F-402B-B04C-2E4FC4B2D463@gmail.com> References: <1281629439.5279.24.camel@localhost> <87tymwrmn9.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37825 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Okv1y-0006No-BJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:26:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Okv1l-0004xq-2P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:26:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:40845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Okv1k-0004xa-RZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:26:41 -0400 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2322613ewy.0 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:26:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tymwrmn9.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Maus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Aug 15, 2010, at 4:11 PM, David Maus wrote: > julien cubizolles wrote: >> I'm also confused about the checkitem type of template. > >> The following template : > >> ("T" "test" checkitem (file+headline "~/org/orgfiles/test.org" >> "Test") >> "%?") > >> doesn't work as I expected : the capture buffer is not narrowed and >> no >> item is created... > > I can confirm this for > > Org-mode version 7.01trans (release_7.01h.115.g1f17) This bug is fixed now. There were two issues. One was that the checkitem stuff was not handled correctly. The other problem did affect both item and checkitem: When there is currently no plain list in the outline entry, it would place the item into another list found in the same direction, even it it was in another outline entry. Both issues are fixed, I think. Thanks for report and confirmation! - Carsten