From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Exporter interface question Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:00:30 +0100 Message-ID: <29AAB460-028B-4972-AAEF-32075115D9CE@gmail.com> References: <871uc2t9z7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35027) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAfga-0007E9-Bz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:00:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAfgZ-0000L2-7c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:00:36 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:40978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAfgZ-0000Kt-26 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:00:35 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id c13so411463eek.28 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 04:00:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871uc2t9z7.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-mode List On 27.2.2013, at 09:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the >> previous export action, that is extremely useful. >> >> I often only export a subtree of a document, and I >> was wondering if others would also find this proposal >> useful: >> >> When exporting a subtree, lets drop a mark at the >> headline and then go to this mark when C-c C-e is >> called with a prefix arguments. This would allow >> to keep the cursor somewhere deep in the subtree while >> working on it, and still be able to quickly repeat the >> export command. > > It would be nice indeed. > > Though, it may be useful to put some additional limitations to this > feature. For example, it would trigger only when on the same buffer as > before, perhaps even within the same subtree. Yes, this is possible. I'll look into it. - Carsten > > What do you think about it? > >> If others would find this useful, I'd make a patch. > > Be my guest. ;) > > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou