From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Patch for bug in adjusting time ranges in Agenda Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:50:06 -0400 Message-ID: <29780.1318863006@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87obxzitcv.fsf@gmail.com> <31715.1318783422@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFoW6-0005a4-Cz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:50:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFoW1-0005Vx-Or for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:50:14 -0400 Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:2382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFoW1-0005Uo-Ia for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:50:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Niels Giesen of "Mon\, 17 Oct 2011 10\:50\:30 +0200." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Niels Giesen Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Orgmode Niels Giesen wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: >=20 > Niels Giesen wrote: >=20=20=20=20 > > *bump* > > > > Has this one slipped through (as I were posting two other patches r= ound the same date, one also > > having to do with date/time ranges in the agenda -- which were both= accepted), or am I just > > impatient? > > >=20=20=20=20 > I tried to check patchwork (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/project/= org-mode/) > but the server seems to be having problems right now. However, that's= the first > place to check when it comes back: if it's there, somebody will get t= o it sooner > or later. >=20 > Ok, I checked today (server is up again) and it's not there. But I've bee= n a fool. Should've > submitted as an attachment as per=C2=A0http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contri= bute.html=C2=A0. Should I try and > resubmit? Probably, but make sure that the attachment is typed properly (text/plain will work, application/octet-stream will not). Inline patches should be accepted though, so I'm not sure why the original did not go through: it may be the indentation of the patch that confused patchwork. Nick