From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: 6.29c export latex bug? Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:54:41 -0400 Message-ID: <28604.1249995281@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <871vnj743l.fsf@gmail.com> <15967.1249950100@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <11010.1249961161@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaquQ-0001qw-FR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:56:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaquL-0001nH-1e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:56:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40748 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaquK-0001n2-N1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:56:52 -0400 Received: from vms173015pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.15]:54017) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaquK-00010M-87 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:56:52 -0400 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([98.110.172.159]) by vms173015.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KO7003IOQJ6RDPB@vms173015.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:54:47 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik of "Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:47:01 +0200." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, zwz Carsten Dominik wrote: > Hi zwz, thanks for the report. > Hi Nick, thanks for nailing it. > > This bug is fixed now. > Indeed - my test succeeded. > Nick, if you are interested, please see the commit log entry for an > explanation why this bug was happening. > I feel like a ping-pong ball :-), smacked from one place in the code to another and back again. Thanks for the explanation! Nick