From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Adding tags, grouping tags Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 07:32:16 +0200 Message-ID: <281FEC66-0C21-419B-BA2E-84D41BB3A0F3@gmail.com> References: <4CB74A73.2090202@gmx.de> <87k4lk57aj.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net> <20101015102958.9266699h4ij44e80@webmail.df.eu> <2673DFCA-F3F1-4155-966C-F4EA739AA79A@gmail.com> <20101015105247.90984aq253ya95k4@webmail.df.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44068 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P6zYW-0001h7-52 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:43:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P6zNU-0004ly-7Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:32:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:33411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P6zNU-0004lt-29 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:32:20 -0400 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so1139976ewy.0 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:32:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ilya Shlyakhter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Oct 15, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Ilya Shlyakhter wrote: > Karl Maihofer gmx.de> writes: >> Besides that I have tags in other contexts, e.g. GTD-related tags >> etc. >> So it would be very useful to be able to group the tags as it is >> possible for agenda commands. > > I think that a way to define logical groups of tags (or even a > hierarchy of tags > -- say with a subtree of tag names?) would be a very useful addition. I can see that this could be useful - but the code is not in any way prepared to do this, so this would be pretty hard to implement. - Carsten