From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: `f' in agenda view Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:33:07 +0200 Message-ID: <27933105-54BF-487F-B0C1-05DD02CC9665@gmail.com> References: <4E96A594.30102@online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFO1q-0001Mb-Gk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:33:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFO1p-000199-4y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:33:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:64972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFO1o-000195-ST for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:33:13 -0400 Received: by wyg34 with SMTP id 34so1228841wyg.0 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:33:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E96A594.30102@online.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rainer Stengele Cc: John Wiegley , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 13.10.2011, at 10:47, Rainer Stengele wrote: > Am 04.10.2011 23:04, schrieb John Wiegley: >>>>>>> Dave Abrahams writes: >>=20 >>> It always strikes me as odd that `f' in agenda view moves the item = forward >>> by a day even if that leaves it still in the past. Typically if I = have an >>> overdue item, I just want to schedule it for today or a certain = number of >>> days in the future, and as it stands it's even a bit non-obvious = when I've >>> finally bumped it up to today if it's a few days old. Shouldn't the = first >>> `f' on an overdue item schedule it for today? >>=20 >> Just to clarify, by 'f' dave means `org-agenda-date-later'. I = believe he's >> using my keybinding for this command... >>=20 >>> I'm happy to hack something locally if the group doesn't agree, but = moving >>> things around in the past seems like such a corner case that I = thought maybe >>> this would be a better default behavior. >>=20 >> I agree with Dave here. 'f' on a past-dated item maybe should move = it today >> on the first press, and then into the future on subsequent presses. >>=20 >> John >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 > +1 >=20 > Me too I sometimes run into this situation where I just want to shift = past-dated items to today. > I never had a use case where I wanted to shift an item from "past" to = "past+n-days