From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pete Phillips Subject: Re: Re: OrgmodeTODOs and checkboxes Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:21:08 +0000 Message-ID: <27775.1225275668@localhost> References: <87k5btkg2c.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <12137.1225204749@localhost> <87mygolgso.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kv8Bq-0001Tk-Bc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:22:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kv8Bo-0001TM-76 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:22:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45667 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kv8Bn-0001TJ-Vm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:22:12 -0400 Received: from mailhost.smtl.co.uk ([193.131.77.174]:3398) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kv8Bf-0001l6-0x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:22:12 -0400 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:23:51 +0100." <87mygolgso.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: org-mode mailing list Morning all. >>>>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Rose writes: Sebastian> Hi Pete, Sebastian> It is the intended behaviour. Sebastian> I just had to set `org-empty-line-terminates-plain-lists' Sebastian> to nil. Hmmm - however I set that variable, I still get the issue that Wes' test file demonstrated. That variable has always been set to nil in my setup btw. Are we talking about something different here ? (that is, have i misunderstood some fundamental issue ?) For what it's worth, howver I set that variable, my previous comments apply: Wes> Your sample file works for me. However, this one does not. Wes> Maybe your example didn't match your actual usage. Note that Wes> if you indent the "one one one..." line below a space further Wes> it starts counting again properly. ------------------------------------------------------------------- * TODO [2/3] List of TODOs (NOTE: 1/1) + [X] one one one one one one one one one one one one one one one + [ ] one + [X] one ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pete> Same here. Zero, one or two spaces at the start of the 'one Pete> one one' line stop it counting. Three spaces is OK. (in fact Pete> anything above 3 appears to be OK). Pete> Note also that a at the start is acceptable as well. Pete