From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vikas Rawal Lists Subject: Re: State of the art in citations Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:30:51 +0200 Message-ID: <262D846B-055E-420B-B1A7-8A10820A8896@agrarianresearch.org> References: <87ppk4ni6i.fsf@gaillac.origami> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wf4NW-0004ZB-Fl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 05:31:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wf4NM-0001n7-IG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 05:31:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:49516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wf4NL-0001mb-WA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 05:30:56 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id d17so89189eek.4 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 02:30:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ppk4ni6i.fsf@gaillac.origami> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Cl=E9ment_B=2E=22?= Cc: julian@hafro.is, org-mode mailing list On 26-Apr-2014, at 6:56 pm, Cl=E9ment B. wrote: > Hi all, >=20 >> - Should I use biblatex instead of bibtex? =20 >=20 > You should. It is very powerful and straightforward. The manual > is great. >=20 Is the choice so clearcut? A lot of bibliographic databases provide bibtex-compatible citation = information. How do you deal with that, when you shift to biblatex? Of course, this is not an org-mode specific limitation at all. But still = relevant, I think, when we are discussing what should be the recommended = way of dealing with citations in org-mode. Vikas=