* Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
@ 2010-09-14 15:01 Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-16 9:55 ` Bernt Hansen
2010-09-17 12:05 ` Matt Lundin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew J. Korty @ 2010-09-14 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe
only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both
the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is
marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp advances.
* TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
This behavior exists in HEAD as well as previous releases, including
7.01h.
Emacs : GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0.0, NS apple-appkit-1038.11)
of 2009-11-10
Package: Org-mode version 7.01trans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-14 15:01 Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans] Andrew J. Korty
@ 2010-09-16 9:55 ` Bernt Hansen
2010-09-16 14:58 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-17 12:05 ` Matt Lundin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bernt Hansen @ 2010-09-16 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew J. Korty; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
"Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> writes:
> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
>
> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe
> only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both
> the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is
> marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp advances.
>
> * TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
> SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
Why not just drop the SCHEDULED: tag and change the DEADLINE task to
DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w -2d>
This way it won't show up in your agenda until Friday -- 2 days before
it's due.
-Bernt
>
> This behavior exists in HEAD as well as previous releases, including
> 7.01h.
>
> Emacs : GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0.0, NS apple-appkit-1038.11)
> of 2009-11-10
> Package: Org-mode version 7.01trans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-16 9:55 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2010-09-16 14:58 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-16 15:28 ` Andrew J. Korty
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew J. Korty @ 2010-09-16 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> wrote:
> > If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe
> > only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both
> > the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is
> > marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp advances.
> >
> > * TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
> > SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
>
> Why not just drop the SCHEDULED: tag and change the DEADLINE task to
>
> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w -2d>
>
> This way it won't show up in your agenda until Friday -- 2 days before
> it's due.
Right, but then it will show up in tags-todo lists before I want it
to. An example is renewing my driver's license, for which I could use
DEADLINE: <2011-10-12 Wed ++4y -2w>
but it would show up in tags-todo lists way before it would make sense
to renew. Although I suppose I could set org-agenda-ignore-deadlines
to 'all and just rely on the daily/weekly agenda to show them to me ...
ajk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-16 14:58 ` Andrew J. Korty
@ 2010-09-16 15:28 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-17 12:29 ` Matt Lundin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew J. Korty @ 2010-09-16 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Andrew J. Korty <ajk@iu.edu> wrote:
> Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> wrote:
>
> > > If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe
> > > only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both
> > > the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is
> > > marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp advances.
> > >
> > > * TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
> > > SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
> >
> > Why not just drop the SCHEDULED: tag and change the DEADLINE task to
> >
> > DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w -2d>
> >
> > This way it won't show up in your agenda until Friday -- 2 days before
> > it's due.
>
> Right, but then it will show up in tags-todo lists before I want it
> to. An example is renewing my driver's license, for which I could use
>
> DEADLINE: <2011-10-12 Wed ++4y -2w>
>
> but it would show up in tags-todo lists way before it would make sense
> to renew. Although I suppose I could set org-agenda-ignore-deadlines
> to 'all and just rely on the daily/weekly agenda to show them to me ...
Oops, frobbing org-agenda-ignore-deadlines won't help. It works in
the case of driver's license renewal, but it breaks a different case.
Say I've been asked to review a document by October 31. So I set a
deadline of 2010-12-31. But I do want to see it on my tags-todo list
now because if I had time now, I could review the documents and submit
my comments well before the deadline.
So that's why I use both SCHEDULE and DEADLINE: for tasks I want to
hide from the daily/weekly agenda *and* tags-todo lists until a
certain date without removing unscheduled items with deadlines from
tags-todo lists.
ajk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-14 15:01 Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans] Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-16 9:55 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2010-09-17 12:05 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-17 12:43 ` Andrew J. Korty
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Matt Lundin @ 2010-09-17 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew J. Korty; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
"Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> writes:
> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
>
> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe
> only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both
> the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is
> marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp advances.
>
> * TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
> SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
I can confirm this bug, although AFAICT it occurs only when both the
SCHEDULED and DEADLINE repeating syntax are of the "++" variety.
E.g.,
The example above results in:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-24 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
However, if the scheduled timestamp is not a "double plus" (++), then
the timestamps advance as expected:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Another example
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri +1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
becomes...
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Another example
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-24 Fri +1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-26 Sun ++1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Other combinations also work as expected:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Another example
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri .+1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun .+1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
becomes...
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Another example
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-24 Fri .+1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-24 Fri .+1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Best,
Matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-16 15:28 ` Andrew J. Korty
@ 2010-09-17 12:29 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-17 12:48 ` Andrew J. Korty
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Matt Lundin @ 2010-09-17 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew J. Korty; +Cc: Bernt Hansen, emacs-orgmode
"Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> writes:
> Andrew J. Korty <ajk@iu.edu> wrote:
>
>> Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > > If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe
>> > > only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both
>> > > the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is
>> > > marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp advances.
>> > >
>> > > * TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
>> > > SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
>> > > Why not just drop the SCHEDULED: tag and change the DEADLINE
>> task to > > DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w -2d>
>> > > This way it won't show up in your agenda until Friday -- 2 days
>> before
>> > it's due.
>>
>> Right, but then it will show up in tags-todo lists before I want it
>> to. An example is renewing my driver's license, for which I could
>> use
>>
>> DEADLINE: <2011-10-12 Wed ++4y -2w>
>>
>> but it would show up in tags-todo lists way before it would make
>> sense to renew. Although I suppose I could set
>> org-agenda-ignore-deadlines to 'all and just rely on the
>> daily/weekly agenda to show them to me ...
>
> Oops, frobbing org-agenda-ignore-deadlines won't help. It works in
> the case of driver's license renewal, but it breaks a different case.
> Say I've been asked to review a document by October 31. So I set a
> deadline of 2010-12-31. But I do want to see it on my tags-todo list
> now because if I had time now, I could review the documents and submit
> my comments well before the deadline.
I assume you mean org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines. In this particular
case you could set that variable to 'far, which causes deadlines to be
displayed only when they fall within the lead time specified in
org-agenda-warning days or (as in the example above) in the timestamp
itself.
Here's an example:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Review really important document
DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun -2m>
* TODO Review less important document
DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Let's assume the following settings:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(setq org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines 'far
org-deadline-warning-days 14)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
With these settings, the first task would show up *today* both in your
agenda and in your TODO list, while the second task would appear in both
places two weeks before the deadline.
That said, I sometimes set both a scheduled and deadline timestamp to
create an extra reminder/safety net, so the original bug you reported is
certainly an issue.
Best,
Matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-17 12:05 ` Matt Lundin
@ 2010-09-17 12:43 ` Andrew J. Korty
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew J. Korty @ 2010-09-17 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
>> If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe
>> only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both
>> the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is
>> marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp advances.
>>
>> * TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
>> SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
>
> I can confirm this bug, although AFAICT it occurs only when both the
> SCHEDULED and DEADLINE repeating syntax are of the "++" variety.
Agreed -- hadn't noticed that before.
ajk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-17 12:29 ` Matt Lundin
@ 2010-09-17 12:48 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-17 18:47 ` Matt Lundin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew J. Korty @ 2010-09-17 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * TODO Review really important document
> DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun -2m>
> * TODO Review less important document
> DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Let's assume the following settings:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (setq org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines 'far
> org-deadline-warning-days 14)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> With these settings, the first task would show up *today* both in your
> agenda and in your TODO list, while the second task would appear in both
> places two weeks before the deadline.
Right, but what I want is for the second task to appear in the todo
list even before two weeks before the deadline, and I don't want it to
appear in the agenda until two weeks before the deadline. In other
words, I always want to see tasks I can do now in my todo lists,
whereas I only want to see tasks that are due soon in the agenda.
Lengthening the lead time won't help because it unnecessarily shows
tasks in the agenda that aren't due soon.
But maybe my usage is not an intended one.
ajk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-17 12:48 ` Andrew J. Korty
@ 2010-09-17 18:47 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-17 21:34 ` Andrew J. Korty
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Matt Lundin @ 2010-09-17 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew J. Korty; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
"Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> writes:
> Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> * TODO Review really important document
>> DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun -2m>
>> * TODO Review less important document
>> DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> Let's assume the following settings:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> (setq org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines 'far
>> org-deadline-warning-days 14)
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> With these settings, the first task would show up *today* both in your
>> agenda and in your TODO list, while the second task would appear in both
>> places two weeks before the deadline.
>
> Right, but what I want is for the second task to appear in the todo
> list even before two weeks before the deadline, and I don't want it to
> appear in the agenda until two weeks before the deadline. In other
> words, I always want to see tasks I can do now in my todo lists,
> whereas I only want to see tasks that are due soon in the agenda.
> Lengthening the lead time won't help because it unnecessarily shows
> tasks in the agenda that aren't due soon.
>
> But maybe my usage is not an intended one.
Oops. I misunderstood your request.
What you are describing is org-mode's default behavior---i.e., to show
all todos with deadlines in the todo list, but only to show deadlines in
the agenda when they are within org-deadline-warning days.
To ensure this behavior, you'll want to make sure that
org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines is set to nil (the default). All todos
with deadlines will then appear in your todo list.
Best,
Matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-17 18:47 ` Matt Lundin
@ 2010-09-17 21:34 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-18 2:39 ` Matt Lundin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew J. Korty @ 2010-09-17 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
> "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> writes:
>
> > Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
> >
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> >> * TODO Review really important document
> >> DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun -2m>
> >> * TODO Review less important document
> >> DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun>
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >>
> >> Let's assume the following settings:
> >>
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> >> (setq org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines 'far
> >> org-deadline-warning-days 14)
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >>
> >> With these settings, the first task would show up *today* both in your
> >> agenda and in your TODO list, while the second task would appear in both
> >> places two weeks before the deadline.
> >
> > Right, but what I want is for the second task to appear in the todo
> > list even before two weeks before the deadline, and I don't want it to
> > appear in the agenda until two weeks before the deadline. In other
> > words, I always want to see tasks I can do now in my todo lists,
> > whereas I only want to see tasks that are due soon in the agenda.
> > Lengthening the lead time won't help because it unnecessarily shows
> > tasks in the agenda that aren't due soon.
> >
> > But maybe my usage is not an intended one.
>
> Oops. I misunderstood your request.
>
> What you are describing is org-mode's default behavior---i.e., to show
> all todos with deadlines in the todo list, but only to show deadlines in
> the agenda when they are within org-deadline-warning days.
>
> To ensure this behavior, you'll want to make sure that
> org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines is set to nil (the default). All todos
> with deadlines will then appear in your todo list.
True, but then we're back to the problem with the driver's license
renewal.
ajk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-17 21:34 ` Andrew J. Korty
@ 2010-09-18 2:39 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-18 13:08 ` Andrew J. Korty
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Matt Lundin @ 2010-09-18 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew J. Korty; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
"Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> writes:
> Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
>
>> "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> writes:
>>
>> > Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> >> * TODO Review really important document
>> >> DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun -2m>
>> >> * TODO Review less important document
>> >> DEADLINE: <2010-10-31 Sun>
>> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> >>
>> >> Let's assume the following settings:
>> >>
>> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> >> (setq org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines 'far
>> >> org-deadline-warning-days 14)
>> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> >>
>> >> With these settings, the first task would show up *today* both in your
>> >> agenda and in your TODO list, while the second task would appear in both
>> >> places two weeks before the deadline.
>> >
>> > Right, but what I want is for the second task to appear in the todo
>> > list even before two weeks before the deadline, and I don't want it to
>> > appear in the agenda until two weeks before the deadline. In other
>> > words, I always want to see tasks I can do now in my todo lists,
>> > whereas I only want to see tasks that are due soon in the agenda.
>> > Lengthening the lead time won't help because it unnecessarily shows
>> > tasks in the agenda that aren't due soon.
>> >
>> > But maybe my usage is not an intended one.
>>
>> Oops. I misunderstood your request.
>>
>> What you are describing is org-mode's default behavior---i.e., to show
>> all todos with deadlines in the todo list, but only to show deadlines in
>> the agenda when they are within org-deadline-warning days.
>>
>> To ensure this behavior, you'll want to make sure that
>> org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines is set to nil (the default). All todos
>> with deadlines will then appear in your todo list.
>
> True, but then we're back to the problem with the driver's license
> renewal.
>
I knew there was a reason for example I provided above. :)
If I understand you correctly, you'd like: 1) deadlines to show up on
your todo list, 2) but not if they are too far away (let's say more than
1 year from now). I believe this scenario is essentially covered by the
original example I provided; all that is required is some tweaking.
Does this custom command accomplish what you're looking for?
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(setq org-agenda-custom-commands
'(("d" "Todos (incl. deadlines)" todo ""
((org-deadline-warning-days 100) ;; change this as you wish
(org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines 'far))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
With this command, you'd see all todos with deadlines that fall a
reasonable distance from the present (in this case, the next 100 days),
but wouldn't see the drivers license renewal 4 years from now.
Best,
Matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans]
2010-09-18 2:39 ` Matt Lundin
@ 2010-09-18 13:08 ` Andrew J. Korty
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew J. Korty @ 2010-09-18 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
> (setq org-agenda-custom-commands
> '(("d" "Todos (incl. deadlines)" todo ""
> ((org-deadline-warning-days 100) ;; change this as you wish
> (org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines 'far))))
Ah, brilliant. Thanks! Essentially this configuration causes the
lead time indicator to mean different things in the agenda versus
tags-todo lists, which is just what I wanted.
I still need to decide if I prefer using lead times to scheduling the
entry (which, for non-repeating entries is slightly easier with the
C-c C-s keybinding). So I may submit a patch for updating all ++
repeaters when I get around to it. Or maybe all I need is a function
to prompt for a lead time and add it to the deadline (from the agenda
or the org file).
ajk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-18 13:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-14 15:01 Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans] Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-16 9:55 ` Bernt Hansen
2010-09-16 14:58 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-16 15:28 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-17 12:29 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-17 12:48 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-17 18:47 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-17 21:34 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-18 2:39 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-18 13:08 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-09-17 12:05 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-17 12:43 ` Andrew J. Korty
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).