From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:10:52 -0400 Message-ID: <24271.1309302652@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <2011-06-24T16-30-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8772.1308931315@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <2011-06-26T13-23-38@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8739ivw8e8.fsf@gnu.org> <2011-06-28T15-28-18@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2011-06-28T18-04-12@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87sjqt6f3i.fsf@gnu.org> <2011-06-28T20-40-40@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <874o39v9td.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53387) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbhQq-0004bL-ER for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:11:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbhQo-0007Cq-Jp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:11:00 -0400 Received: from g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.61]:1892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbhQo-0007CN-8h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:10:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Bastien of "Wed\, 29 Jun 2011 01\:02\:38 +0200." <874o39v9td.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: news1142@Karl-Voit.at, nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien wrote: > Hello Karl, >=20 > Karl Voit writes: >=20 > > Sorry when I disagree for one case: > > > > When I change each entry in my test data using =C2=ABC-c .=C2=BB and cl= icking > > on 1st of July ... > > > > ,----[ test data ] > > | <2011-06-28 Tue> > > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w> > > | <2011-06-28 Tue -1d> > > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w -1d> > > `---- > > > > ... I end up having this: > > > > ,----[ result ] > > | <2011-07-01 Fri> > > | <2011-07-01 Fri +1w> > > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d> > > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d> > > `---- > > > > In the last case, the repeater gets lost :-( >=20 > I cannot reproduce this. >=20 I can - but after earlier today, I'm not sure I trust my eyes: anybody else? Org-mode version 7.5 (baseline.387.gf9cc.dirty) (the dirty part is because of some Makefile experiments, nothing to do with= timestamps). > Note that if you use the warning _before_ the repeater, > then it gets losts:=20 >=20 > <2011-06-28 Tue -1d +1w> That's not the problem - check the "before" state of the third of Karl's examples. >=20 > That because the warning should always be _after_ the repeater: >=20 > See section 8.3.2 "Repeated tasks" in the manual >=20 > "the repeater should come first and the warning period last: > `DEADLINE: <2005-10-01 Sat +1m -3d>'." >=20 Nick