From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: html export Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:17:45 -0400 Message-ID: <23083.1277065065@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <871vc28js3.fsf@gmail.com> <48C8312A-7793-49D0-AA26-24AB15AC662F@tsdye.com> <877hlt606l.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45145 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQQxh-0007tW-2K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:17:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQQxf-0002rK-Nw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:17:49 -0400 Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]:51548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQQxf-0002rG-KH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:17:47 -0400 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L4B004UTXPMYY50@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:17:46 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from "Eric Schulte" of "Sun, 20 Jun 2010 11:14:42 PDT." <877hlt606l.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Org Mode Eric Schulte wrote: > "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > > [...] > > Removing the blank line doesn't work for me either. > > > > Org-mode version 6.36trans (release_6.36.291.gaf90f) > > > > Hmm, I just tried the above again using the HEAD (same org-version > output as you have above) of the org-mode git repository and a minimal > emacs config, and it *is* working for me, so maybe your problems will be > resolved with an update of org-mode, or maybe they're due to something > in your config? > I think the difference between Eric's experiment and Tom's is the filename of the image - Eric uses a relative pathname, whereas Tom uses an absolute one: ,---- | | * No caption | | #+CAPTION: Histogram of adze weights on a logarithmic scale | #+LABEL: fig:wt-log | [[file:Pic1.png]] `---- produces a caption, but ,---- | | * No caption | | #+CAPTION: Histogram of adze weights on a logarithmic scale | #+LABEL: fig:wt-log | [[file:~/Desktop/Pic1.png]] `---- does not. Also, the alignment of the image changes in the two cases, which leads me to believe that one is treated as a display and the other as an inline image. Nick