From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: moving in the agenda view is slow Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:56:44 -0500 Message-ID: <22632.1291046204@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <877hfzbsaj.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <32269.1290826390@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF0E9D0.3010302@diplan.de> <589.1290877232@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF14D17.1010905@online.de> <11315.1290885811@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF1740B.6030405@online.de> <87pqtp73jw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <25801.1290972566@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF2B010.9040904@diplan.de> <3201.1290979966@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF385BD.3010101@online.de> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52558 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PN665-0006xd-PV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:56:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PN664-00028o-IZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]:53172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PN664-00028g-EA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:56:56 -0500 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LCN00FOGLMIKZ10@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:56:43 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: Message from Rainer Stengele of "Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:51:41 +0100." <4CF385BD.3010101@online.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rainer Stengele Cc: Rainer Stengele , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Eric S Fraga Rainer Stengele wrote: > > scrolling with "n" and "p" runs smoothly now! Sigh! That means the > slowness is connected to my .emacs and org settings!? I'am afraid I > have to go through all the settings and find the culprit. > Great! That's real progress: in one fell swoop, you have eliminated 99.99% of the code that could be the culprit :-) However, it's not clear to me that it's your org settings: if the next-line sluggishness is real, then it's something in the emacs setup that causes it (again, unless there is some hidden connection back to org that I know nothing about). Nick