From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: custom IDs not exported Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:44:45 -0400 Message-ID: <22611.1320345885@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87hb7wq9bc.wl%n142857@gmail.com> <10721.1307848346@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <20111101170154.GC1993@aberdeen> <9894.1320212032@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87wrbic7k4.fsf@gnu.org> <4490.1320332040@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <817h3hqgk9.fsf@gmail.com> <12929.1320344289@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <81lirx2gnl.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM2HS-0001Ba-SD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:44:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM2HQ-0004cH-NW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:44:50 -0400 Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:32960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM2HQ-0004br-Hw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:44:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Jambunathan K of "Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:10:46 +0530." <81lirx2gnl.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien , org-mode Mailinglist , Sten Lindner Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Jambunathan K wrote: > > > Not sure I follow completely, but I will continue trying to cajole others > > to provide the actual patches and limit myself to providing guidance if > > necessary. > > Thanks for *not* submitting a patch. > > What I meant was - there is a process in place and Emacs project + FSF > are quite earnest as far as sticking to their own guns. > > [Context Switch] > An interesting read (Euphemism for *totally* OT) > > http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2820986 > Also google - Emacs violates GPL. > Is this the cedet/semantic parser flap-a-doodle? LWN covered it some time ago. AFAIK, it has been resolved. Nick