From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [Bug] local variables definition at beginning of file is ignored Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:58:06 -0400 Message-ID: <22400.1316703486@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <20110922073638.GB3746@kenny.fritz.box> <21917.1316702581@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6lJp-0008Sm-GF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:36:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6lJn-0007ZA-WC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:36:09 -0400 Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:28547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6lJn-0007Z0-Sh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:36:07 -0400 Received: from g1t0039.austin.hp.com (g1t0039.austin.hp.com [16.236.32.45]) by g1t0026.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F946C276 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:58:07 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Message from Nick Dokos of "Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:43:01 EDT." <21917.1316702581@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Nick Dokos wrote: > Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/47043 I've posted two > > examples of local file definitions at the top of an org file which are > > silently ignored for seemingly unrelated parts in the org file. The > > definitions work if they are put at the end of the org file. > > > > This inconsistency is a bug, isn't it? Also, are local variables > > documented somewhere? I couldn't find anything in the manual. > > > > No, it's not. Did you see my reply to Darlan's mail last night? > Sorry, I jumped the gun: I should have read further in the list. Nick