From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg Minshall <minshall@acm.org>
Subject: Re: non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:49:09 +0530
Message-ID: <21575.1517361549@minshall-apollo.minshall.org>
References: <87372nysl1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35303)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <minshall@acm.org>) id 1egh3S-0003ls-U5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:19:15 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <minshall@acm.org>) id 1egh3P-0003m6-PA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:19:14 -0500
Received: from relay01.pair.com ([209.68.5.15]:49057)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <minshall@acm.org>) id 1egh3P-0003lx-Lo
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:19:11 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:55:38 +0100."
	<87372nysl1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Content-ID: <21574.1517361549.1@minshall-apollo.minshall.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Nico,

ah, thanks!

not wanting to look gift horses, etc., but i've a question.  if i
understand the change correctly
----
-             (looking-at "\\<call_\\([^ \t\n[(]+\\)[([]"))
+             (looking-at "call_\\([^ \t\n[(]+\\)[([]"))
----
now something like "oncall_foo()" will be taken as "on" followed by the
inline results of call_foo().  is that right?  (testing, seems to be.)

i worry that might be a bit too lenient.  sometimes one might want
"oncall_foo()" to stay as "oncall_foo()".  (that's why i was thinking of
some, hmm, "non-spacing break", like the string "{{{}}}", or, well,
almost anything, "\.", "\#", "#" -- maybe the cleanest? -- ...)

cheers, Greg