From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg Minshall <minshall@acm.org>
Subject: Re: non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:41:08 +0700
Message-ID: <20809.1517668868@minshall-apollo.minshall.org>
References: <87o9l6uou5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37035)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <minshall@acm.org>) id 1ehz0D-0001Lz-Ob
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 09:41:14 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <minshall@acm.org>) id 1ehz0A-0004Mz-Fx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 09:41:13 -0500
Received: from relay01.pair.com ([209.68.5.15]:37009)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <minshall@acm.org>) id 1ehz0A-0004MP-Bb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 09:41:10 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 03 Feb 2018 15:31:30 +0100."
	<87o9l6uou5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Content-ID: <20808.1517668868.1@minshall-apollo.minshall.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>

> Of course we do: just write 
> 
>   foocall<ZSWP>_foo()
> 
> or
> 
>   foocall_foo<ZSWP>()

!!! :)

(but, seems less intuitive.  maybe my math/CS brainwashing, liking to
have lexical elements, etc.; that part of me would still vote for
reverting.)