From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Roland Winkler" Subject: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:08:03 -0600 Message-ID: <20759.54259.751629.173184@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87zjzc2kxx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42922) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4aOY-0008NW-Jt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:08:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4aOV-0005IA-5G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:08:50 -0500 Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87zjzc2kxx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org On Sun Feb 10 2013 Bastien wrote: > > Why put this in a separate FAQ? Aren't the info pages the first > > source of information for such things? > > Depends. We try to keep the info manual readable, and it's already > quite long. If you can find a good place in the manual, please send > a patch. I do not find the info nodes on "Structural markup elements" particularly overloaded. The node "Emphasis and monospace" is just one short paragraph, and org-fontify-emphasized-text could esily be mentioned there -- unless this variable also affects other things, so that it should be mentioned higher up in the node hierarchy. If such things get distributed among different places, an info manual plus a separate FAQ, they get yet more confusing, in particular for casual users of org mode. Many users will not even know (or expect) that the info manual does not give them the full story, but they need to consult other sources, too. Take the elisp manual: it's pretty big. But I like it because its authors are pretty good in making it an *efficient* and *reliable* source of information. (Here I'd like to put these words in bold, because I really appreciate this!)