From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: embedded/inherited tags Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:02:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20524da70904011602y6c077c70x3598ed7fd28f0bef@mail.gmail.com> References: <61176df0903280629g76b084cen50eec7fc0bb7271a@mail.gmail.com> <61176df0903300747n1f301d80v7733f4c055abd719@mail.gmail.com> <938fae2d0903300925p39534429t8c93bbdc9d6bca48@mail.gmail.com> <61176df0903311425mcd60f5ct474b6bbc7ff5caf8@mail.gmail.com> <20524da70903311515g545f65cem16c4c497da218d79@mail.gmail.com> <61176df0903311643v253b723en663fd28a8b083086@mail.gmail.com> <52ED26C8-3FD4-4E7C-B188-CA9DF4543740@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lp9S2-0007sJ-QJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:02:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lp9Rx-0007rT-Ij for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:02:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34838 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lp9Rx-0007rQ-C9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:02:25 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:52692) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lp9Rw-0003L3-U3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:02:25 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so142010wah.26 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:02:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52ED26C8-3FD4-4E7C-B188-CA9DF4543740@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten, On 2009-04-01, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Did I really say I was going to make this, Samuel? I'll let you decide. :) Carsten earlier wrote: > - Your proposal to use lisp syntax for agenda queries > (Sep 16) is high on my todo list and not forgotten. > Something I do want, but have not gotten around to. -- from <77A37195-6E8E-4BEE-A05D-14B89A74904A@uva.nl> , which has a few other items also. Did I misinterpret? Of course, I will not hold you to it either way. :) It seemed to me when I wrote to Konstantin that the feature could be expected to happen at some point. In any case, please accept my apology if that is a misinterpretation, since I don't want to put words in your mouth! I described some of the benefits of the optional Lisp syntax in <20524da70809152215y55dccdd3sd62d299b893ce287@mail.gmail.com> "Re: Searching for tags or todo keywords". It's not a critical feature, but it seems likely to solve the problem in that thread (IIRC), and also help Konstantin a bit. I would find it easy to use. However, the solution that I proposed to Konstantin can use existing search syntax if he desires. Hope that helps. -- Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early; Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly corrupting science. http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm