From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: outline-agenda sorting consistency part 2 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:25:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20524da70903261325i1b15d242jd84e2c1a1cb2f68b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lmw9a-0005bF-Vg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:26:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lmw9W-0005ab-DV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:26:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39671 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lmw9W-0005aY-7K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:26:14 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]:58350) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lmw9V-0002Ny-U6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:26:14 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so413456wah.26 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:26:11 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org A couple of sorting-related issues, under a different subject header so as not to get confused with the issues in the previous one. 1. It looks like "priority" means both priority /letter/ and priority /as calculated/. I got confused by this at first when I wanted to sort using priority-down to mean sorting by letter. Is there a way to sort by priority-letter-down in the agenda? This might create an order that is more stable over time, thus allowing you to know where to look for an item. 2. Is it possible to allow a user-definable sorting strategy member for the agenda? i.e. user-definable-down. -- Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early; Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly corrupting science. http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm