From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: footnote questions Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:37:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20524da70901302137u32f8060w16bd975d4479eecd@mail.gmail.com> References: <20524da70901232138i4ef4f8d3l399c5c467597ad02@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LT8XW-0008FH-0O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:37:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LT8XU-0008Ed-CZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:37:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52760 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LT8XU-0008EY-29 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:37:08 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:65087) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LT8XT-0002LS-NM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:37:07 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so167755nfi.26 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:37:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten, \\ would work OK for me, but perhaps there is a solution even without it. Useful because \\ does not fill correctly, in my filladapt setup, at least. I am likely to use footnotes in one of 2 ways: the document is the body of a single entry, in which case I want footnotes at the end of that, or the document is the whole org file. I tried the former, and it of course does not insert "Footnotes:". However, if it did, perhaps it would be easier to code having more than one paragraph. This is, for me, not a big issue at all. Just a suggestion that might work. By the way, I found that sorting footnotes had the effect of not sorting them fully (at least when there is one foothnote that was deleted; have not narrowed down) and also moving footnotes in other parts of the org file. When I am using footnotes in one part of an org file, I would want other parts not to be affected. So perhaps a variable can control this behavior. Perhaps by unoverloading org-footnote-section? Again not a huge issue, just a suggestion. Thanks for the tips.