From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id GLCHI12yrGUU+gAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:57:49 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id GLCHI12yrGUU+gAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:57:49 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=WPhGJOKp; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705816669; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=23+HKbTA8+OpoyKz3FZLU5QTYFp14xO0gMfeH+pXzoY=; b=SaYTh4VGNUeLB08Q9IozBrH+wiwLkJniRKhggOU35S6ZN2wv/fL9/QWl2I8YYdGA2z9dYu I69tEcSYwsy+TC5F/UId6Qn6M08F/IYhLQpkRR57yWS1phr8yb4af+bb3vGLGS9NZKmSVn tzYOoTwHQTgpbE0ww6u0X5MT4j4QDz9Y/6/mcUmvWLdHSeybuN52gjhGMCDUkjm9BiAT2Y StMDTi/KM6CGIPT0B+xyvVQAlfv28dNh7f7xVGqN2TTt4VvoZxlANRw/Ibg66dlCufTEbq tA1ivSI7kKwJJtJAWZ5U9vJoCdJ7qY4eGKCvudbLJRKpMUkYuoiFR3lmchaGOg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705816669; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BgeYR778P007FpmcBKPoFBVGfUXyPKHB6emjOmyaG7RYResNY4cGYvVFRWEsgYzKx0A59k 46Fg8h9YZNCBHACFsAY6ZxU1H7CFDYDdtFbf4gPX0rC2HF955R00acfnyjQIbtSW0GdWvl qjoAjk7j3cfZILrZhf/kYjSgFXWfhalDk9CZOsU/DYwuVJJnCa6lx1C8y/VA9ynXcveyF0 lw1sgv+zuNCb1n3giUAomzeTswMJwZ9BljYJiio8Fo0+C8abdGIpHP9bqvhZDco7cpL9Yg NWLoOp5tFgDC8e6b9sWptiLdtEHRF2pBsFvOqY3sr853b5lceASMjdi3eaFedQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=WPhGJOKp; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB95778BD for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:57:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRQpE-0000hS-DL; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 00:56:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRQpD-0000hI-7q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 00:56:55 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRQpA-0000dh-An for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 00:56:55 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cd0f4f306fso22946351fa.0 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:56:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705816610; x=1706421410; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mail-followup-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=23+HKbTA8+OpoyKz3FZLU5QTYFp14xO0gMfeH+pXzoY=; b=WPhGJOKpTfqCldOlxC5pdznW/Iu7jE74gyro6KoiB4L5GSrwf9HhwQWO8fhFpcFejU 2LbTTe8z8l3bqWx54xsrvIlINNF8AowLxdHfTDBt4NuyQocRppyEJAHNbXsdIwqn1o4y 7+3yva6q/QzdsdAPKWJ8VcUDIXOie0gLvu3f9PXYSbSygCX/s8cAupK6bENc9HnBLsUd +/BKfzm0w52KsAA808vQwDID8uG9daUOM/nHNKk4H/uLW1+2OpQx0Y8tXAKDt9LefcSq i/4+/c78/cdPONAObKfF5csfkcRyY74wvpD4wPSgJZsNjMGBx07jaqhF7CgsJj7x0pku 2uuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705816610; x=1706421410; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mail-followup-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=23+HKbTA8+OpoyKz3FZLU5QTYFp14xO0gMfeH+pXzoY=; b=unRAtuvX2HiWgFVe2mvVnx1jGUBoh1Eshg4wDcuzwlmsC/WUz7TuyEnsU86VqcwQ61 iKRWaqWC8u8JMVIDxfGnnl+KcmSUVAhPR7mvhVtVUBzjNhFSp7v1JxJHgLWmbNeANwi0 n5k8kZdyH72XiLCLf051f738jPUfFiY9Q7Vo91GhqZ3RK3dva3PEjIBBM8UgnlBMvAlA obZfHA15NwfZQUdNDqKk4aLhwUNtbjfnsg5wn58MFRIK3Cki91+UqveCvESc5ztaRtGu CHR6FUgVIBc9zk4OCO2EQArwmSBz+PVOHj0l8Xjxj8MWhDQqnmJhB9MqTVPuDaEyR6KG hi/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxLZgIJcqbYA6JF1Ag9r3VA30XpleXRuNvIJiWfGJYWm7EBnGat lCwIZY+eXpDGWsGlKWQEuKftf3w4HpNLoNFFo3VZd2GgHjdnXLDk X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEaiyfxjez8mr40aqlDTxfzD4WFtcAm8/hGtdl09ocW8Q3DIJ+Fo1eZwOVScGq7XRGSy+SrqA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8190:0:b0:2ce:c3f:3aee with SMTP id e16-20020a2e8190000000b002ce0c3f3aeemr279201ljg.91.1705816609972; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:56:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (nat-0-0.nsk.sibset.net. [5.44.169.188]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t3-20020a2e9c43000000b002cd5447e184sm3020296ljj.4.2024.01.20.21.56.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:56:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20402957-beb7-4ed7-bf1d-bc0ca237f481@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 12:56:48 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [possible patch] Remove the '\\[0pt]' string from the last line of a verse block in LaTeX export Content-Language: en-US, ru-RU To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org References: <874jfvjo2k.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu5uv7c.fsf@localhost> <878r4tfccn.fsf@posteo.net> <87zfx9t7di.fsf@localhost> <87wmsddlw5.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0ikrt5h.fsf@localhost> <87o7dnefwo.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu1l69f.fsf@localhost> <87il3tax9a.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uwjerg.fsf@localhost> <87o7dju9vn.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uuaj11.fsf@localhost> <87v87o5g8p.fsf@localhost> From: Max Nikulin Mail-Followup-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87v87o5g8p.fsf@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::233; envelope-from=manikulin@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x233.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 4.39 X-Spam-Score: 4.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5FB95778BD X-TUID: Nt1Lnh02x8ZQ On 20/01/2024 19:41, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Max Nikulin writes: > >> To have an additional excuse, it is better to add a note that it is >> inspired by pandoc strategy. > > I can add it to the code comment, but for different reason. We do not > give "excuses" to make breaking changes - https://bzg.fr/en/the-software-maintainers-pledge/ > But we do keep the flexibility to make changes where Org mode behavior > is undefined. Like in this case. De-facto \\[0pt] was a breaking change despite formal contracts. I do not consider it as a wrong decision though. It is the case when where was no good choice, instead just ones that may cause some troubles (including leaving everything as is). I recall some threads (besides ones started by Juan Manuel) where users considered [0pt] as an undesired consequence of some other changes. That is why I wrote "excuse".