On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:47:31AM -0500, Mario Frasca wrote:
> I'm rewriting a complicated construction where there's an equality
> test on the length of the list of non matching elements, with a
> simpler cl-some invocation.  The replacing code is self explanatory.

Isn't `seq-some' equivalent? (in this case, at least; cl-some is
willing to take more than one sequence).

Cheers
-- t