From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregor Zattler Subject: document depreciation of timeline? (was: Re: Bug: Displaying timeline for .org-file and then switching to including inactive timestamps will not include old and future inactive timestamps [8.3.1 (8.3.1-16-gf6aa53-elpa @ /Users/cube/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20150810/)]) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:07:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20150824090725.GB13516@boo.workgroup> References: <87oahxy7jy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53583) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTnja-00086z-DC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:08:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTnjX-0004LV-5I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:08:06 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:65369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTnjW-0004LH-RU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:08:03 -0400 Received: from boo.workgroup ([87.185.173.133]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRTiG-1ZIl5d3rqK-00ShCv for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:08:02 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87oahxy7jy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Hi Nicolas, * Nicolas Goaziou [24. Aug. 2015]: > There are many advertised limitations to Timeline feature. Actually, > Timeline feature is moribund[fn:1][fn:2]. Use Agenda view instead. [... 4 Zeilen gelöscht ...] > [fn:1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39368/focus=40038 > > [fn:2] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/60518 There are only two commits which mention the timeline in their summry lines in the newer git history since 2008-01-31. Shouldn't the feature then be officially depreciated and mentioned as stale in the manual? The manual mentions the timeline in most cases together with the agenda. And there is a small chapter dedicated to the timeline. If depreciation of the timeline is OK I would patch the manual accordingly. Ciao, Gregor -- -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-