From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregor Zattler Subject: 3 thanks (was: Re: Bug: Capturing to datetree with inactive timestamp messes up level of heading) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:15:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20150822071519.GA12650@boo.workgroup> References: <20150819220651.GE2464@boo.workgroup> <871tewjmgu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZT31z-0002Ea-OB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 03:16:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZT31w-0000hu-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 03:15:59 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:63465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZT31w-0000hk-Dl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 03:15:56 -0400 Received: from boo.workgroup ([87.185.166.198]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MK17F-1ZUQTX3H7d-001ScG for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:15:54 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871tewjmgu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Hi Nicolas, * Nicolas Goaziou [22. Aug. 2015]: > Gregor Zattler writes: >> customizing org to add timestamps in datetrees via … >> (org-datetree-add-timestamp (quote inactive) nil nil "Add an >> inactive time stamp when create a datetree entry.")… and >> activating a minimal capture template which captures to a >> datetree results in: >> >> a) >> >> * 2015 >> ** 2015-08 August >> *** 2015-08-19 Mittwoch >> [2015-08-19 Mi] >> ** actual entry heading of captured item >> >> The heading of the newly captured item is at level 2 instead at >> level 4. I consider this to be a bug. A second capture item to >> the same day is correctly created at level 4 (and bevor the first >> captured item which does not belong to the same (or any) day in >> the datetree). > > Fixed. Thank you. Thanks. >> 2) > This is a different feature. Since it belongs to the captured entry, the > timestamp should be defined in your capture template (e.g. "%t" > placeholder) instead. Thanks. >> 3) > See above. You can use "%T". Thanks again. Ciao, Gregor -- -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-