From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: Exporting multiple images in a float (LaTeX) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 01:56:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20150808235645.GO28462@chitra.no-ip.org> References: <20150806164208.GB2797@chitra.no-ip.org> <87bnekkq81.fsf@gmx.us> <877fp8kq0m.fsf@gmx.us> <20150807042442.GD28462@chitra.no-ip.org> <87r3nfgrc5.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <20150807141400.GH28462@chitra.no-ip.org> <874mkbnpmz.fsf@gmx.us> <87mvy3gjg9.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <871tfdy46q.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36437) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZODyv-00018W-7G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:56:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZODyr-0008Ma-KV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:56:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:38878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZODyr-0008Lh-DG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:56:49 -0400 Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so107099099wib.1 for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chitra.no-ip.org (5072840E.static.ziggozakelijk.nl. [80.114.132.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r8sm6036908wiz.5.2015.08.08.16.56.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871tfdy46q.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Rasmus wrote: > Eric S Fraga writes: > > > On Friday, 7 Aug 2015 at 16:23, Rasmus wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> I guess there would also be no loss from actually inserting a "%" after > >> \includegraphics[·]{·} in ox-latex. > > > > Except that then the suggestion I just made would not work and would in > > fact be quite confusing as the second figure would be lost in the > > export? > > But we can insert "%\n" and in the latex end there's no difference between > > \includegraphics[]{}% > \includegraphics[]{}% > > And > > \includegraphics[]{}\includegraphics[]{}% > > To the best of my knowledge. I think you are correct! -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.