From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: Target and link text normalised to `orgtargetn' Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 16:06:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20150419140619.GD14328@chitra.no-ip.org> References: <87zj699ez9.fsf@gmx.us> <20150416001830.GC14328@chitra.no-ip.org> <87egnk9ycz.fsf@gmx.us> <87k2x9cddu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20150419121305.GZ14328@chitra.no-ip.org> <87618smg2i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20150419132425.GA14328@chitra.no-ip.org> <87618sfd8o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20150419134928.GC14328@chitra.no-ip.org> <871tjgfchl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjpri-0004Qh-4g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:06:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjprd-0002H4-2D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:06:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]:38389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjprc-0002Gv-RY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:06:25 -0400 Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so65020979wiu.1 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 07:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871tjgfchl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 03:56:22PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Suvayu Ali writes: > > > Ah, that was my report, that option did not work for me completely. > > See: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/96887/focus=96888. > > > > To summarise quickly, with the above option set to t all > > references/links behave as I expect, except the ones where the target is > > a `bare target'. > > > > Does that mean there was indeed a bug? > > Yes, Rasmus fixed it in f1548e11fe2972819bc48b88c6094b11150e5c8a. I just > fixed Rasmus' fix wrt radio targets. Ah, okk. Up to speed now. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.