From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: Custom environment for LaTeX export Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 12:51:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20140815105152.GA12653@chitra.no-ip.org> References: <87y4vytg5r.fsf@free.fr> <86k36xedt9.fsf@somewhere.org> <877g2gvni9.fsf@free.fr> <20140811092430.GB2336@chitra.no-ip.org> <86vbpv6rkx.fsf@somewhere.org> <20140815094609.GA2329@chitra.no-ip.org> <87zjf6oyof.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIF70-0002Pj-0Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 06:51:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIF6z-0004AI-4i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 06:51:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]:60201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIF6y-0004AD-So for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 06:51:57 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id x12so2144858wgg.4 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 03:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chitra.no-ip.org ([2001:610:120:3001:2ad2:44ff:fe4a:b029]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gi15sm18041031wjc.20.2014.08.15.03.51.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Aug 2014 03:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zjf6oyof.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:05:36PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Suvayu Ali writes: > > > This is a bit odd to me; is this a consequence of the fact that > > ox-beamer derives from ox-latex? > > Yes, "ox-beamer.el" knows abouv "ox-latex.el". However, "ox-latex.el" > has no clue about all possible back-ends that could derive from it. > > > Is it a feature or a bug? > > Feature of derived back-ends, which have more information than the > original back-end. Thanks for confirming. Once someone understands the reason, it is probably not odd any more. I guess sometimes this is very useful, and sometimes gets in the way :). Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.