From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: New worg page: Publishing beamer slideshows and articles from one source Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 15:15:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20140527131516.GC2270@chitra.no-ip.org> References: <3cc8efb7-57ae-4749-9c7e-3c178adb911d@dewdrop-world.net> <20140512191732.GA2281@chitra.no-ip.org> <87zjibuupv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20140524095416.GD28472@chitra.no-ip.org> <87zji6dv5x.fsf@gmx.us> <87fvjx3yew.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2f0u9ah.fsf@gmx.us> <87mwe4n219.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwe4sfd5.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpHE6-0003Lj-2P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:15:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpHDx-00085E-0J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:15:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]:42266) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpHDw-00084g-Ps for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:15:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id x12so9682243wgg.9 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 06:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chitra.no-ip.org (84-53-110-255.wxdsl.nl. [84.53.110.255]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p15sm4786393wiv.8.2014.05.27.06.15.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 May 2014 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mwe4sfd5.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Rasmus, Bastien, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Rasmus wrote: > > I have attached a quick patch with a text that I think is more > accurate and that tries to explain the issue. I think the tone may be > too "academic"/dry. > > Since Suvayu put the initial effort into the answer I will wait for > his approval before submitting it. Sorry I was a bit sloppy. The origin of the hack is from LaTeX export. I did not test it extensively for other backends. Now I realise why it worked for me; I always export with no toc for html and ascii. and LaTeX takes care of toc. Your patch looks good, however I think the language is indeed too academic and could be simplified and made more accesible. It is Worg after all :). > >> To deal with the tricky part you need an additional filter. Or you > >> need a filter on the final output and you'd probably need to make some > >> accounting of what's present and what is not so that you can update > >> counters and TOCs. > > > > That's why I say it's tricky. > > > > Let's keep this constructive and move forward -- maybe that was not > > your intention, but the tone of your first email was a bit harsh. > > I'm sure Suvayu is open to suggestions on how to improve the filter. > > That was not the intention. For that I appoligize. In fact, I'm always of the opinion, if the change is minor, or corrects a mistake, or simplifies things, just go ahead with it. It is a community resource! I won't have time to work on this any time soon (now I'm at a workshop, review deadline next week, holiday the week after). Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.