From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word** Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:32:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20140323113246.GC7474@chitra.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <87zjl6ktu2.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwgimiqm.fsf@gmail.com> <87txaqmhzd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh1umeso.fsf@gmail.com> <20140323010635.2d2323fb@aga-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRgeG-0007s8-QW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:33:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRge8-0005gQ-Du for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:33:04 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::235]:59378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRge8-0005em-6O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:32:56 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f53.google.com with SMTP id b57so3420949eek.12 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chitra.dyndns-at-home.com (sd44012d5.adsl.online.nl. [212.64.18.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t44sm25487093eeo.6.2014.03.23.04.32.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140323010635.2d2323fb@aga-netbook> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 01:06:35AM +0100, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 16:30:31 > Nicolas Goaziou napisaƂ(a): > > > > Also, there is no "backward-compatibility squad", only users who > > > care about what they like. > > > > That is what they want us to believe! :) > > Ninja'd! > > Re: topic: one idea that is maybe not very Org-ish, but seems > reasonable: Org already uses LaTeX syntax for sub/superscripts, and > accepts LaTeX snippets etc. Why not allow \textbf{something} parallel > to *something*? Would it break something? When using the LaTeX > exporter, currently it seems (from very few simple experiments), that > \textbf{whatever} copies "whatever" verbatim to the file (I tried LaTeX > and HTML exporters). Often LaTeX users tend to forget (including myself) one of Org's features is to be able to export to different backends without major modifications to the source file (.org file). Your proposal breaks that. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.