From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: [Exporter] Why is :author a list in the communication channel? Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:07:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20131104210736.03f0e9b6@aga-netbook> References: <87wqkqczb0.fsf@gmail.com> <87li16qw4m.fsf@gmail.com> <8761s8javx.fsf@gmail.com> <87sivcc9lk.fsf@gmail.com> <871u2wj9eu.fsf@gmail.com> <87ob60c6cv.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdQRO-0002sK-R1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:08:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdQRJ-00020d-3K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:08:02 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:58137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdQRI-0001w5-FF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:07:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7455E69BEA for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:07:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHeBDtZp2LqL for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:07:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from aga-netbook (99-52.echostar.pl [213.156.99.52]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3927F69BE6 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:07:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87ob60c6cv.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dnia 2013-11-04, o godz. 20:30:24 Nicolas Goaziou napisa=C5=82(a): > Thorsten Jolitz writes: >=20 > > Ok, I understand, so this is all working fine just as intended. For > > multiple authors one could use a workaround/convention like=20 > > > > ,------------------------------------------ > > | #+author: Thorsten_Jolitz Thomas_Mueller > > `------------------------------------------ > > > > and then split the string two times (first blanks, then > > underscores). >=20 > It is also possible to allow multiple author lines, by adding `space' > behaviour in `org-export-options-alist', but I'm not sure this is > really necessary. It is well possible that I don't understand something here, but in some LaTeX classes you use \author{...} many times instead of the default \author{... \and ...}. Maybe when exporting to such LaTeX classes, allowing multiple #+AUTHOR: lines might make sense? > Regards, Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University