From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: Feature request: info-org-manual Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 12:34:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20130928103402.GP12411@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <20130928115330.11946d26@aga-netbook> <20130928101031.GN12411@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <404F0A1C-3E10-43C6-A291-160DA928E7E5@gmail.com> <20130928122405.7ed5cbfa@aga-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VPrqp-0007s4-Pf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:34:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VPrqh-0004n2-CY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:34:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::233]:51989) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VPrqh-0004mu-5N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:34:07 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b10so1657084eae.38 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 03:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130928122405.7ed5cbfa@aga-netbook> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:24:05PM +0200, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > Dnia 2013-09-28, o godz. 12:16:52 > Carsten Dominik napisaƂ(a): > > > > > On 28.9.2013, at 12:10, Suvayu Ali > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Marcin, > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:53:30AM +0200, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> there is the info-emacs-manual, bound to C-h r. Why not introduce > > >> info-org-manual, like this: > > > > > > I'll play the Devil's advocate, there are many emacs packages with > > > info pages of their own. AFAIK, none of them do this. That said, > > > if such a command is introduced, probably it should be org-info; > > > > That command does already exist. Also accessible from > > the Org menu, under Documentation. And indeed, we need to stay > > in org's namespace, I agree. > > Sorry, then. It happened once again: I thought "it would be nice if > Org had such-and-such feature", and it already has it... It's kinda > creepy;). (I'll probably bind it to some handy key in my init.el, > though.) Yeah, happens all the time. I have been using Org since 2009 I think, and I didn't know! :) -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.